Parashat Shoftim
A Home Of Our
Own: From Soweto To The Suburbs
The prohibition
against encroaching on your neighbor's land teaches us that our own expansion
and success must not compromise the success of others.
By Rabbi Phil Miller
The following article is reprinted with permission from SocialAction.com.
I bought a new home recently. A major acquisition such as
this has caused me to reflect on the meaning of having a home.
Two summers ago, visiting South
Africa, I spent time in Soweto, the sprawling black city outside of
Johannesburg. I visited with families in makeshift tin shacks with dirt floors
and no electricity or running water. The South African government has been
building new homes at a great pace, but it lags far behind the need. Families
will wait years to receive a new home.
What struck me more than anything
was the size of these new homes being built. They are row after row of dark,
tightly packed one- or two-bedroom homes, which often house several families.
The South African dream of homeownership was a shadow of the most humble home
in which I've ever lived.
How can someone possess so nice a
home when so many in the world settle for so much less? And how can the
citizens of Soweto feel any satisfaction from the tiny homes they will acquire
one day?
This week's Torah portion, Shoftim
teaches the prohibition of hasagat gevul, encroaching on a neighbor's
land.
"You shall not move your
countrymen's landmarks set up by previous generations in the property that will
be allotted to you in the land that the Lord your God is giving you to
possess."
Rashi, the 11th-century French
master commentator, says regarding this:
"This prohibition occurs when
a person moves his boundary marker into his neighbor's property in order to
broaden his own territory."
Rashi goes on to explain that such
behavior is also a violation of the basic prohibition against theft. Other
commentators explain that even moving the marker a finger's breadth violates
this prohibition.
Ramban (a 13th-century Spanish commentator) explains the
psychology behind this prohibition.
"A person should not think,
'My property which I have been given is less than that of my neighbor's.'"
Ramban implies that by itself, the
mental attitude of feeling that your property is inferior to your neighbors violates
this prohibition, even before a person has actually moved their boundary
markers.
The Talmud records a discussion
that takes a similar perspective on the "boundaries" between
businesses (Baba Bathra 21B).
Rabbi Huna: If a resident of an
alley sets up a hand mill and another resident of the alley wants to set up one
next to him, the first has the right to stop him, because he can say to him,
"You are interfering with my livelihood."
Rabbi Huna ben Joshua said: It is
quite clear to me that the resident of one town can [only] prevent the resident
of another town from establishing a competing outlet in his town . . . only if
[the latter person does not] pay taxes to that town, and that the resident of
an alley can not prevent another resident of the same alley from establishing a
competing outlet in his alley."
Rabbi Huna is interested also in
protecting boundaries and warning a business owner of encroaching on the
territory of another. The Talmud sides with the less restrictive opinion of
Rabbi Huna ben Joshua. However, many later authorities argue that in cases of
ruinous competition, the law is like the more protective opinion of Rabbi Huna.
These different texts present two
fundamental Jewish principles on owning a home and property. Expanding your
territory can not come at the expense of another. Yet these texts also seem to
respect and even honor an individual's right to have a home.
The prophet Micah goes even
further. Having one's own place is the greatest of blessings. In describing his
vision for the utopian end of days, Micah proclaims;
"And they shall beat their
swords into plow-shares, and their spears into pruning hooks. Nations shall not
take up sword against nations; they shall never again know war; but every man
shall sit under his grapevine or fig tree with no one to disturb him."
Essential to creating this
redeemed world, argues Micah, is each person having their own grapevine
or fig tree. Utopia is not the anarchists' dream of property-less society.
Rather it is a world in which each person has their own special place where
they can not be disturbed.
Perhaps on a deeper level, Micah
is teaching something else also. In an unredeemed world, there are still
opportunities for tasting what that better world can one day be. Having one's
own home is such a taste of redemption. The more a person's home protects them
from the disturbances of the outside world, the greater the taste.
Micah tells us that my home and
the humblest of new homes being built in Soweto both provide the taste of that
redemption. However, for me, the dissonance between the world inside my home
and the world without is so much greater. For all of us for whom this is true,
the obligation to work for that redeemed world, with the blessings of safety
and home for all, is also much greater.
The beauty of your new home,
teaches the prophet Micah, must not only give you the comfort you deserve; it
also must compel you to go back out into the world and see that all of its
inhabitants can one day share this joy under their own grapevine and fig tree.
Rabbi Phil Miller was ordained at Yeshiva University and
is director of the Helene Mirowitz Department of Jewish Life at the Jewish
Community Center of St. Louis.