Parashat Sh'mot
The Book of Names
Our names are our essence.
By Udi Hammerman
This
commentary is provided by special arrangement with Canfei Nesharim. To learn
more, visit www.canfeinesharim.org.

Sh'mot, the Hebrew title of the Book of Exodus,
means "names," suggesting how significant the issue of identity will
be as the saga of Jewish slavery, redemption, and revelation unfolds. Sh'mot
opens with a list of the names of the Children of Israel as they came down to
Egypt, counting each individual within those families: "Now all those
descended from Jacob were seventy souls, and Joseph, who was in Egypt (Exodus
1:5)."
Shortly afterwards, "A new king arose over Egypt, who
did not know about Joseph (Exodus 1:8)." This Pharaoh, unaware of the name
of the most famous Israelite--in fact, one of the most famous men in all of
Egypt--will dedicate his life to eradicating all that the first few verses of
Sh'mot had established.
Dehumanization
By considering Pharaoh's process of dehumanizing
(essentially un-naming) the Children of Israel, we will discover how powerful
names are, and how they can help us build a world of greater consciousness and
conscientiousness.
Feeling threatened by the presence of the Children of Israel
flourishing in his land, Pharaoh begins a multi-staged plan of isolation and
oppression in order to estrange them from Egyptian society. As if anticipating
Pharaoh's next move, the Torah sets the stage by describing Israel as if it
were a colony of insects: "The Children of Israel were fruitful and
swarmed and increased and became very strong, and the land became filled with
them (Exodus 1:7)."
Viewed in such a light, Israel arouses disgust in the
Egyptian people.This is
in strong distinction to the opening of Sh'mot, in which each of the tribal
heads are named, and every person, seventy souls, is counted.
Soon after
that, "the Egyptians enslaved the Children of Israel with
backbreaking labor," fully alienating them from Egyptian society. They
become a lowly caste of slaves, harshly driven by their taskmasters. The
Midrash says that the excessive toil was designed to wear out the men and keep
them from their wives, so that they would not reproduce.
Next, Pharaoh tries to get the Hebrew midwives to kill all
newly born males. From here it is a small step indeed to the final Solution:
Pharoah commands his people to drown all male babies in the Nile.
How terribly reminiscent of our people's recent history.
First the dehumanization, the terrible propaganda, that ascribed the name of
enemy to an entire people. Friends, neighbors, business partners, great
thinkers--the Nazis learned to see all these people as nothing but Jude, Jew.
The alienation brought by such an appellation facilitated
their removal from society, an important stage whose ultimate consequence was
concentration camps and the giving of numbers to each individual, utterly
obliterating any sense of name at all. Now, numbered like objects in a
warehouse, the people were so dehumanized their wholesale slaughter seemed
perfectly acceptable.
Names in the Torah
The significance of names in the Torah is apparent from the
beginning. Seeking a helpmate for the first man, God brings all of the animals
of the world before him, "To see what the man would call them (Genesis
2:18-19)." Before names, the man is alone. The act of naming opens the
potential for relationship.
However, the text does not record the names given by man to
any of the animals. When woman, the one to whom man can truly relate, is
created, he says (Genesis 2:23): "This is bone from my bones, flesh from
my flesh, therefore let her be called Ishah
(woman) for she was taken out of Ish
(man)."
The first name explicated in the Torah is a name of deep,
essential connection. Later, the first woman is given an even more specific
name--Chava (Eve)--because she is in universal relationship: "the
mother of all the living (Genesis 3:20)."
Our names are our essence. They are meant to describe what
we truly are. If there were no names, what could one person call another?
"Hey you: tall guy, smart guy, guy with red hair…" We would have no
connection to anyone's true essence. There could be no real relationship.
Why is it that turning people into numbers is such a
terrible thought to us? Because removing the name undermines the true nature of
humans! Using numbers to tell the difference between one person and another
means that I do not care at all about the people I am counting. I just need a
way of telling them apart, like apples in a barrel!
That is the destruction of individuality, the destruction of
personal meaning, and the destruction of relationship. It is relating to human
beings only in terms of functionality, in terms of their usefulness to me, and
not at all in terms of who they are, of caring, of relationship.
If the removal of names can lead to the destruction of a
people, then the appropriate use of names can bring redemption. God's desire to
liberate the slaves is aroused, in part, by the names with which Sh'mot opens.
By keeping their Hebrew names during the period of enslavement, the Israelites
prevented total assimilation into Egyptian culture. God teaches Moses various
Divine names and their meanings to prepare him for his role as liberator.
Humans are brought into the world to give things their
essence, their meaning, and their place in the world. When we do this, we truly
fulfill our Divine purpose. When we do not, we risk destroying God's world. We
must constantly be asking ourselves about our relationships. Are they
relationships of love and caring, or are they self-serving and exploitative?
How do I relate to those different than me? How do I relate
to the world beyond my immediate surroundings, for example, to the rainforests?
To the cows at the factory dairy farm whose milk I drink every morning? To the
chickens at the industrial poultry shed near my house? When I buy brand new
sneakers, do I consider who made them? How was that individual human being
treated while he or she made my shoes?
If we deny the names--the unique identity--of other
people, of the creatures and plants and places of the earth, we risk becoming
like Pharaoh and all the other despots of the world. Threatened by the
complexity and variety of the world, they chose to see others as nameless
resources, as nothing more than a means towards their own personal goals. Such
a path, while often seeming to increase comfort and efficiency in the present,
ultimately leads to slavery and oblivion.
Udi
Hammerman studies psychology and Jewish philosophy at the Hebrew University. He
also works extensively in outdoor Jewish education with teens and young adults,
guiding trips and as part of the Program and Curriculum Development team for
Derech Hateva, an association connected with the Society for the Protection of
Nature in Israel.