Being Held to a Higher Standard

In biblical times and today, religious leaders must be paragons of righteousness.

Print this page Print this page

Reprinted with permission of the Jewish Theological Seminary.

After a profusion of dietary regulations, our parasha reemphasizes the fundamental purpose of Judaism: "For I the Lord am your God: you shall sanctify yourselves and be holy, for I am holy" (Leviticus 11:44). A pervasive sense of holiness is the key to this-worldly salvation. To live wisely requires self-control. There is no creation without contraction. To spring we first need to coil. The regimen of Judaism is to help us keep the big picture in sight, make wholesome distinctions and prevent the numbing of our spiritual sensibility. Transgressions erode our inner life, while doing mitzvot brings an infusion of holiness. In the words of the Rabbis: "If we embark on hallowing our lives on earth, we will be hallowed abundantly from above" (Babylonian Talmud Yoma 39a).

Since this vision of life is a tall order for most of us, which we approximate at best only partially, religious leadership in Judaism carries a special burden. Its qualifications are defined by the ideal rather than the real. As a bridge between the human and divine, religious leaders serve as symbolic exemplars (Jack H. Bloom's term), the embodiment of the best to which Judaism aspires. The book of Proverbs celebrates the righteous as "an everlasting foundation," unharmed by the whirlwind that topples the wicked (10:25). Playing on the Hebrew of that phrase (yesod 'olam), the Talmud asserts that even a single righteous person can sustain the world (Babylonian Talmud Yoma 38b). That is, the piety exhibited in one life has the power to touch many, indeed, to ameliorate the human condition.

What brings me to reflect on the nature of religious leadership is the narrative fragment embedded in the middle of our parasha. There we find the consecration of Aaron and his four sons as the custodians of the Tabernacle darkened by the calamitous death of two of them. Nadab and Abihu on their own, uncommanded by God, "offered before the Lord unauthorized coals" (Leviticus 10:1 trans. Jacob Milgrom), an impulsive act which brought on instantaneous death. Proximity to the holy tolerated no digression. Its numinous quality, if disregarded, can wreak havoc. With greater responsibility came the need for a higher degree of punctiliousness.

This, at least, is how I choose to understand Moses' words of comfort to Aaron in devastation's wake: "This is what the Lord meant when he said: 'Through those near to me I shall sanctify myself, and before all the people I shall glorify myself'" (Milgrom's trans.) The Rabbis took Moses to be referring back to Exodus 29:43, where God seemed to allude darkly to a sanctification of the Tabernacle by the death of those closest to God (Babylonian Talmud Zevahim 115b). God deemed Nadab and Abihu to be even more pious than Moses and Aaron. Their death made God's awesomeness still more manifest. To preserve the consolatory force of Moses' words, the Rabbis stretched the meaning of the biblical text. My preference is to read Moses' words as a reprimand. Nadab and Abihu failed the test of religious leadership. Those serving God must be paragons of piety. Their behavior is what sanctifies God's name for a wayward, if well meaning, flock. Aaron's silence bespeaks the bitterness of the rebuke.

Did you like this article?  MyJewishLearning is a not-for-profit organization.

Please consider making a donation today.

Rabbi Ismar Schorsch

Rabbi Ismar Schorsch served as chancellor of the Jewish Theological Seminary.