Primer: Jewish Bioethics
About Jewish Bioethics: What
is Jewish bioethics? There is no simple answer to this question. The
relationship between Jewish law (halakha),
Jewish ethics, and the ethical principles of general society are navigated
differently by different Jewish authorities. However, there is one principle
that can be singled out for its prominence in Jewish bioethical discourse: the
sanctity of human life and the duty to save and preserve it wherever possible.
Abortion: Judaism does
not categorically approve or disapprove of abortion. Jewish law does not
consider a fetus to be a human being; thus it actually requires abortions when
a pregnant woman’s life is in danger. Jewish authorities disagree on whether to
extend the permissibility of abortion to situations where the pregnancy or
birth is psychologically but not physically dangerous. Those who allow for
abortion in such cases disagree on how far to extend this permissibility. Most
of these authorities allow abortion in cases of incest or rape and cases where
the fetus is affected with a terminal genetic disease such as Tay-Sachs. Other
authorities extend permissibility further and may include cases where the fetus
has a non-terminal genetic defect or even situations where the mere fact of pregnancy
and anticipated childbirth is a threat to the mother’s mental health.
Organ Donation: A slew
of ethical and halakhic questions arose when organ transplants first became
viable. Ultimately, however, most of these problems were neutralized by a single
legal and ethical concept—pikuach nefesh,
the Jewish obligation to save lives. Except in those cases where one of two
parallel organs, e.g. kidneys, can be donated by a living individual, it is
imperative that an organ donor be halakhicallydead before her vital organs are removed; thus, defining the
moment of death is essential. Today, most rabbinic authorities accept brain
stem death—as opposed to cessation of heartbeat—as halakhic death, thus
allowing organ transplantation under Jewish law.
Genetic Issues: Jewish
authorities encourage genetic testing so that individuals can determine whether
they carry genes for any characteristically Jewish genetic diseases, such as
Tay-Sachs. Some rabbinic authorities endorse testing on fetuses as well and
allow abortions for fetuses that test positive for terminal diseases. Genetic
engineering—including cloning—for therapeutic purposes is endorsed by most
Jewish authorities. However, many object to the potential use of cloning for
reproductive purposes.
Euthanasia: According
to the Talmud, a goses, a dying
person, is considered no different than any other human being. Not only does
the Talmud consider one who kills a goses
to be a murderer, it prohibits any actions that may speed up her death. Thus,
traditionally, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are prohibited by
Jewish law. Nevertheless, most Jewish authorities object to any actions that
impede the death of a sufferer. Additionally, liberal authorities like Reform
rabbi Peter Knobel support the termination of life in situations of extreme
suffering, when a person’s tzelem elohim,
or divine image, is compromised. Conservative rabbi Elliot Dorff has also
questioned the relevance of the goses
category, and in doing so comes to more liberal conclusions about end-of-life
issues.
Fertility Technologies: A
host of options now exist for couples and individuals who have difficulty
conceiving through conventional means. “Artificial” insemination, in vitro
fertilization (IVF), and surrogate motherhood all raise ethical and legal
questions. Could insemination with donor sperm be considered adultery? Is the
child born from such procedures illegitimate? What is the status of unused
embryos after IVF is completed? Who is the mother—and what is the Jewish
status—of a child born to a surrogate mother? There are few unanimous answers
to such questions. However, procreation is a mitzvah, a fundamental Jewish obligation, and so these procedures
are often permitted, particularly when the egg and sperm are those of husband
and wife.