Jewish Views on Christianity
Theological
attitudes toward Christianity have changed over time in response to social and
political developments.
By Louis Jacobs
The church began
censoring unflattering references to Christianity in Jewish texts in the mid-13th
century. Thus uncensored versions of the Talmud influenced early medieval
attitudes toward Christianity. In addition, mention should be made of the
vehemently anti-Christian Toledot
Yeshu (The Life of Jesus), a
Jewish biographical narrative about Jesus, which probably appeared in its
complete form around the 10th century. In it, Jesus is presented as the product
of a rape--a disrespectful rebel who achieved supernatural powers by stealing a
holy name from the Temple. In recent years, many Christian groups have
reconsidered their traditionally hostile attitude toward Judaism, which has in
turn, led many liberal Jewish theologians to soften their attitudes toward
Christianity. Reprinted with permission from The Jewish Religion: A
Companion, published by Oxford
University Press.
In its very earliest days, Christianity was seen by the
Jewish teachers as a Jewish heresy; its adherents were Jews who believed in the
divinity of Christ [and considered Christianity a Jewish sect]. But when
Christianity spread and became a world religion, with numerous converts from
the Gentile world, it became a rival religion to Judaism. Christians were then
seen as Gentiles not because they were Christians but because, in the main,
they were, in fact, Gentiles (i.e. not Jewish).
Rabbinic Attitudes
In the Talmud and midrash, the comparatively few references
to Christianity (these only appear in uncensored versions) are to this religion
as a heretical sect believing in a form of dualism, God the Father and God the
Son.
Typical is the comment of the late third‑century
Palestinian teacher, Rabbi Abbahu, on the verse (Isaiah 44:6): "I am the
first, and I am the last, and beside Me there is no God." As Rabbi Abbahu
spells it out: "'I am the first,' for I have no father; 'and I am the
last,' for I have no son, 'and beside Me there is no God,' for I have no
brother." Since the doctrine of the Trinity did not emerge fully until a
later period, there are no references to this doctrine in the Talmud or
midrash, despite far‑fetched attempts to find hints of it in these
sources.
It was not until the Middle Ages that the status of
Christianity (and of Islam) as a rival religion was considered from the Jewish
point of view.
Medieval Attitudes
Attacks on Christian dogma are found in medieval Jewish
writings from the biblical commentaries of Rashi and [David] Kimhi, refuting
the Christian claim that the Old Testament contains prophesies anticipating the
coming of Jesus, through works of apologetics such as the Kuzari of Judah Halevi and the Faith
Strengthened of [the Karaite] Isaac of Troki (d. 1593), to the records
drawn up by Jews of the various disputations they had with Christians [perhaps
the most famous being the disputation about the nature of the Messiah between
the apostate Pablo Christiani and Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, Nahmanides, in 1263].
In these and similar works the main thrust was to deny that
the Messiah had come in the person of Jesus (the world gave no evidence that
this glorious age had arrived, it was frequently protested) and especially to
take issue with the doctrine of the Incarnation and the Trinity.
As [the Venetian rabbi] Leon da Modena noted, it was not the
doctrine of the Trinity in itself that was objectionable (after all, in the
kabbalistic doctrine of the Sefirot there is much talk of three, and more,
aspects of [the] Deity) but its elaboration, in which the Trinity is composed
of three divine Persons, one of which became incarnate in a human being. The
medieval thinkers who held Christianity but not Islam to be an idolatrous faith
did so particularly because of the worship of the Cross; to bow before an icon
or a crucifix was held to be akin to bowing to idols.
The basic question in practice was whether the older
talmudic regulations against social intercourse and business dealings with
pagans on the days of their festivals (because they might offer praise to their
gods at the successful outcome of the deal) applied to Christians. With Jews
living among Christians to apply these regulations would have been
catastrophic, if not impossible.
The French scholars [such as Menahem Meiri, discussed below]
tended to adopt casuistic arguments in order to circumvent some of the more
onerous rules; they argued, for instance, that any money given by Christians to
the Church is largely for the benefit of the clergy, and there are certainly no
actual sacrifices of animals or birds to idols as there were in talmudic times.
Menahem Meiri [a thirteenth-century talmudist] went much
further to argue that the references to pagans in the talmudic literature could
not apply to what he called "people whose lives are governed by
religion." Eventually, a distinction was made, unknown in the talmudic
sources, according to which Christianity did constitute idolatry for Jews but
not "for them" (i.e. Christians). A Christian did not offend against
the Noahide laws [the seven principles, including the rejection of idolatry, by
which Judaism expects non-Jews to live] since the Torah allows a Gentile, but
not a Jew, to worship another being in addition to God.
This concept was known as shittuf ("association," of another together with God) and
the oft‑quoted legal maxim, allowing for a more liberal attitude towards
Christians, is: "A Noahide is not enjoined to reject shittuf."
Social needs obviously called forth this artificial
distinction which was by no means universally accepted. As late as the end of
the eighteenth century, Elijah, Gaon of Vilna, ruled that, since it is
forbidden to mention the name of an idol, a Jew may refer to Jesus but never
use the name Christ.
In the twentieth century, the halakhic authorities debated
whether it is permitted to use an abandoned church as a synagogue, or for a Jew
to give a donation to a church or even enter a church, or wear a medal in the
shape of a cross. In the last instance, permission was given, on the grounds
that the medal is a decoration, not an object of worship. Some authorities
permitted a Jew to trade in the sale of crosses to Christians, provided these
were to be worn not for purposes of worship but simply as decorations.
Modern Attitudes
In modern times there has been far greater cooperation
between Jews and Christians, many Jews welcoming Jewish‑Christian
dialogues in which the aim of each side is to understand the position of the
other, and even learn from it, without in any way moving from its own.
Some Jews believe that Judaism and Christianity have so much
in common that it is permissible to speak of a Jewish-Christian tradition. But
there is the strongest opposition on the part of all Jews, Orthodox,
Conservative, and Reform, to the attempts by Christian missionary groups to
convert Jews to Christianity. The Jews for Jesus movement is very much a fringe
phenomenon and has justly been condemned by all faithful Jews as trying to
introduce Christianity to Jews through the back door, so to speak.
A single contemporary Orthodox Jewish theologian in the US
has argued that Judaism does not oblige Jews to reject the doctrine of the
incarnation as impossible in itself. For him, Jews reject Christianity not
because God could not have become incarnate in a human being, since that would
compromise God's omnipotence, but because, in fact, He did not do so in the
person of Jesus.
This eccentric view is rejected by all other Jewish
theologians on the grounds that God, being God, can as little become human as
He can wish Himself out of existence. As Aquinas said--and he was anticipated
by Jewish thinkers--it is no compromise of God's omnipotence that He cannot do
the absolutely impossible.
[British Jewish theologian] C. G. Montefiore, while
insisting that a Jew cannot be at the same time a Christian, argues that some
aspects of the Christian ethic are superior to the Jewish, for which he was
attacked by [Zionist thinker] Ahad Ha‑Am. On the scholarly level, there
have been Jewish investigations into the Jewish background of Christianity, but
in a purely objective way with the theological questions seen as irrelevant to
scholarship.
It would certainly be incorrect to say that the suspicions
of the two religions of one another are a thing of the past. What can be said
is that, in an age of greater religious tolerance, there has been a growing
realization that the two have enough in common to enable them to work in
harmony for human betterment.
Rabbi Dr. Louis Jacobs
is the rabbi of the New London Synagogue, Goldsmid Visiting Professor at
University College London, and Visiting Professor at Lancaster University. His books include Jewish Prayer, We Have Reason to Believe, Principles of the Jewish Faith, and A Jewish Theology.
(c) Louis Jacobs,
1995. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of
this material may be stored, transmitted, retransmitted, lent, or reproduced in
any form or medium without the permission of Oxford University Press.