Counting the years
How the Jewish year is numbered
By Rabbi Rachel Leila Miller
The Jewish calendar not only has its own unique months, but
it also numbers years differently from the secular calendar. The year 2003, for
instance, was roughly equivalent to the Jewish year 5763. (Specifically, Rosh
Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, in September 2003 marked the transition from
5763 to 5764).
The counting of Jewish years, as we know it today, dates
from the Middle Ages. In secular texts, Jewish time is often noted as “A.M.”--anno mundo--literally, “years of the
world.” (Occasionally, “A.M.” is explained as standing for aera mundi, “era of the world.”)
This system of Jewish time is called the “Mundane Era” (English for aera mundi) because those who invented
it believed they were calculating dates from the birth of the world.
Chronologies of the Bible and Temple
The basis of the Jewish annual calendar is ancient. The
Torah speaks of the annual cycle of holy days and festivals, and it was
systematized by the sages well before the fall of the Second Temple in 70 C.E.
If one tries to ascertain the origin of our counting of
years, however, the Bible does not seem particularly helpful. When providing a
history, the Bible refers to lifetimes. For example, the Torah tells us that
Abraham was 75 years old when he and his household were sent from Haran
to Canaan (Genesis 12:4). In the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles, dates
are generally given according to the years of a sovereign’s rule.
Most often, the dates are consistent among these five books.
During the time when two kings ruled the divided kingdoms of Judah and Israel,
the ascendance of one state’s king might be given relative to the years of the
other king’s reign. For example, II Kings 14:1 reads: “In the second year of
[the reign of] Yoash ben Yoahaz, King of Israel, Amatzyahu ruled [i.e.
came to the throne] as King of Judah.”
During the fourth century B.C.E., a dating system was sought
out for secular use on business and legal documents. At this time, the Jews
borrowed the practice of the Greeks, who had introduced the practice of
numbering time in “eras”--periods of time relative to a historical event,
rather than the lifetime or rule of any one person. This new system is called
the “Seleucid Era” by secular scholars and, in Jewish circles, it is known as “minyan shtarot”--“accounting of
contracts.” It counts time from the year 312-311 B.C.E., supposedly six years
following the arrival of Alexander in the Land of Israel.
For private records and Temple histories, a different era
was established, one measured from the Exodus from Egypt. An example of this
can be seen in I Kings 6:1, where the date for the construction of the First
Temple is given as 480 of the Exodus era.
Calculating the Birth of the World
The Tannaim (sages of the late Second Temple Period and the
century after the destruction) calculated the date of Creation. They did so by
basing their work upon the Bible’s account of lifetimes and kingdoms, thereby
determining the period of time from Creation to a known date, in this case, the
destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E.
Many rabbis attempted this task, but the method attributed
to Rabbi Yossi ben Halafta, a second century C.E. sage, is the one which gained
popularity. He calculated “molad tohu”--“birth
from nothing”--to be in the fourth hour of Monday, October 7, 3761 B.C.E.
(according to the Gregorian calendar used in the secular world today). In
Hebrew, this moment has the mnemonic acronym “BeHaRD”, which stands for:
Bet: the second day of the week, Monday
(since the letter bet often
represents the number two);
Hei: the fifth hour (since hei represents five);
Reish-Daled: 204 halakim (“parts,” a smaller measure of time, based on the
idea that reish=200, daled=4).
The calculation of BeHaRD
is discussed in a work attributed to Rabbi Yossi, Seder Olam (“Order of the World”), which is also sometimes called Seder Olam Rabbah in order to
distinguish it from a work of similar name (the later Gaonic work, Seder Olam Zuta).
Innumerable scholars, both Jewish and Christian, have
attempted to calculate the date of Creation. Even if they used the same basis
(Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible) for their systems of accounting, there is a broad
range among their estimates. The historian des Vignoles stated in the
introduction to his treatise on chronology that he had found well over 200
different calculations of the time from the birth of the world to the fall of
the Second Temple, and that they varied by as much as 3,500 years. Well into
the rule of Queen Victoria of England the most commonly given date for Creation
was the year 4004 B.C.E., calculated by Bishop Usher, who published this date
in 1654.
To this day, those Jews who believe the biblical accounting
of time to be literal still accept Rabbi Yossi’s calculation, dating Creation
to the year 3761 B.C.E. Others claim that the date is figurative, symbolic, or
holds esoteric meaning. In calculating BeHaRD,
Rabbi Yossi tried to justify disparate accountings from the following sources:
the chronologies of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles; those of the Second Temple
kingdoms, in rabbinic histories passed down to the Talmud and found in the
Babylonian Talmud, Avodah Zarah 9a
and 10a; and the prophecies of Jeremiah and Daniel.
Some academics compare the Genesis accounting of dates with
those of the Greeks, Chaldeans (including the Babylonians), Egyptians, and
Hindus. The Chaldeans, Egyptians, and Hindus used enormous figures, into the
millions of years, to explain the timeframe of Creation. The ancient Hebrews
and Greeks seemed unwilling to deal in such large numbers. Both peoples
ascribed Creation to a date closer to their own times. This may indicate either
a political agenda (consciously or subconsciously communicating a cultural
chauvinism) or may simply be a simplification for the purpose of clarity.
It is possible that there is a direct correlation between
the seven days of Creation mentioned in Genesis and a specific Babylonian
system, which would suggest that each Genesis “day” represents a specific
number of solar years.
Establishment of the Mundane Era
The Seleucid and Mundane Eras coexisted for numerous
centuries. Most often, Rav Sherira Gaon--the last Gaon, the head of the
academies in Babylonia in the centuries following the editing of the Talmud--is
given the credit for suggesting the use of BeHaRD
as the basis for a chronological system, in the 10th century C.E.
Maimonides (1135-1204 C.E.) at times used multiple eras,
giving a date first according to the years following the destruction of the
Second Temple, then according to the Seleucid Era, and finally according to the
Mundane Era. This suggests that no single system had achieved universal
acceptance by the 13th century.
The Seleucid Era continued to be used in parts of the Arab
world until quite late. Among Egyptian Jewry, it was the dominant system used until
Rabbi David ibn Abi Zimra discontinued its use in the 16th century C.E.; in
parts of the Arabian Peninsula, it was used alongside the Mundane Era as late
as the 19th century.
Rabbi Rachel Leila Miller is a Conservative rabbi and
educator living in the San Francisco Bay area. In 2001, she received her
ordination from the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies at the University of
Judaism. She currently serves as Educational Director at Congregation B'nai
Shalom in Walnut Creek.