National Holocaust Memorials
A transnational comparison.
By Brigitte Sion
The
Holocaust poses new challenges for commemorative representations. How to
remember the six million civilians murdered for who they were--and not for what
was done to them? How to represent a tragedy that is characterized by absence,
from the missing bodies to the destroyed gas chambers, the absence of names and
archives? How to design a national Holocaust memorial in a country that
participated in the deportation of Jews, or in a country that did not
experience the Holocaust on its soil?
Among
the countries that have a national Holocaust memorial, Israel, France, the
United States, and Germany offer contrasting responses to Holocaust
commemoration and representation.
Israel
The
first national Holocaust memorial was erected in Israel, the country that
became home to the majority of Holocaust survivors. On August 19, 1953, the Knesset
(Israeli parliament) passed the Yad Vashem Law, which established the authority
to commemorate the six million Jews murdered by the Nazis; their destroyed
communities; those who fought and struggled; and the Righteous among the
Nations who risked their lives to save Jews.
Yad Vashem, located on Har Hazikaron
(the Mount of Remembrance) in Jerusalem, first included a crypt with an eternal
flame burning next to the names of major concentration camps. The original
complex was also comprised of a sculpture garden, a museum, and an archive and
research center. The permanent exhibition emphasized the role of Jewish heroes,
martyrs, and survivors, in accordance with the early Zionist vision that
honored the "new Jew" as a proud fighter rather than a helpless
victim.
In 2005, the memorial reopened after a ten-year renovation
and expansion designed by Israeli architect Moshe Safdie, whose architecture
itself carries meaning: the tilted walls forming a triangle represent the star
of David, and visitors zigzag between dead-end rooms, artifacts that block
hallways, and narrow spaces. The new historical museum is a multi-media exhibit
about the Holocaust, ending with a breathtaking view of the Jerusalem
hills--confirmation of the redemptive nature of the State of Israel after the
Holocaust.
Until this impressive extension, Yad Vashem was viewed as a
dusty, old-fashioned museum, and it attracted mostly Jewish visitors. The huge
new complex has immediately become a major tourism destination for diverse
groups of visitors. The powerful effect of the new Yad Vashem is precisely the
combination of thoughtful architecture, solemn space, artworks, a didactic
museum, and a center dedicated to research.
France
The Holocaust memorial of Paris was
envisioned at the same time as Yad Vashem, but it was initiated by the Jewish
community, not the French government. This reflects France's ambiguous role and
image during and after World War II. Over 76,000 Jews were deported from France
with the zealous help of the Vichy government and police, but after the war,
France presented itself as a model of resistance to the occupiers, and kept its
distance from the Holocaust.
In
1961, France did sponsor a national monument to deportation, a crypt located by
Notre-Dame Cathedral by the Seine River, that indiscriminately honors all
victims of deportation.
The
Jewish memorial, initiated by members of the Jewish resistance, was unveiled in
Paris on October 30, 1956 in the presence of European political and religious
leaders. Similar to Yad Vashem, it is a crypt with an eternal flame burning
amidst names of concentration camps. A year later, France's Chief rabbi Jacob
Kaplan solemnly deposited ashes from death camps and from the Warsaw ghetto in
the crypt, changing the nature of the memorial to a holy place containing human
remains. The main focus of the memorial is the archive and research center that
was started during the war by members of the Jewish underground who tried to
document the persecution of Jews as it unfolded.
In
2005, the French memorial underwent State-financed renovation and a monument
was added to the site. Now, in the front patio, two white marble walls bear the
alphabetically organized names of Holocaust victims deported from France.
Visitors can touch the name of a relative, and leave yahrzeit (memorial) candles or flowers at the wall, an echo to Maya
Lin's Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D.C.
The
wall in Paris is powerful, reflecting the extent of the loss of Jewish lives in
France, but it is also modest, and it can sometimes go unnoticed by visitors
who rush to enter the main building. There is, however, a little room in the
museum that acts as a more condensed and efficient memorial, displaying the
Vichy Police files on Jews. This collection of thousands of index files,
compiled between 1941 and 1944 to identify French Jews for deportation, is
displayed behind a glass wall and is accessible to researchers. Though
incomplete, the files represent an original and authentic memorial to the
victims, in many ways stronger than newly built walls or multi-media exhibits.
The United States
Like Israel, the United States did not experience the
Holocaust on its soil, but became home to a large number of Holocaust survivors
and a significant Jewish community of European origin. In 1980, the U.S.
Congress agreed to have a Holocaust memorial and museum built on the National
Mall in Washington, D.C.
Funded by the government and inaugurated in 1994, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum's
prominent location among other national landmarks shows how the Holocaust is
integrated in American history, and how the Jewish experience is part of the
contemporary American landscape.
The architect of the museum, James Ingo Freed, introduced
the concept of architecture as a "resonator of memory." Some rooms
remind visitors of barbed-wired camps or fenced ghettos; visitors feel a sense
of oppression as the steel doors of the elevator contain them tight in almost
no light; they take hallways that lead to dead-ends; they are crowded in narrow
rooms. The architecture serves the content of the exhibition by leading
visitors to experience a kind of malaise in their bodies, and not just learn
about the Holocaust with their intellect.
The
museum includes replicas of objects--a cattle wagon used for deportation,
clothes of inmates, documents--that contribute to unsettling visitors and
making their experience moving and disturbing. Some critics have argued that
the use of replica, as well as television screens and other display devices, is
too gimmicky, and contributes to the "Disneyfication" of the
Holocaust.
At the end of the day, however, the USHMM is one of the most
visited museums in Washington, especially by thousands of students who learn
about anti-Semitism and the Holocaust there for the first time.
The USHMM also includes temporary exhibits that relate to
other genocides, from Bosnia to Rwanda to Darfur, an avenue that very few
Holocaust-related institutions have taken.
Germany
It took 17 years of campaigning, two design competitions, a
vote in the Parliament and $30 million of federal budget before Germany
unveiled its first national Memorial
to the Murdered Jews of Europe in the heart of Berlin in 2005.
American architect Peter Eisenman designed the memorial,
arranging 2,711 rectangular stelae looking like tombstones in a grid. The
architect aimed for minimalism and abstraction, and wanted visitors to wander
through the memorial and experience an uncanny and threatening feeling, meant
to evoke the Nazi camps.
Because of its extreme simplicity and the absence of markers
specific to the Holocaust, the memorial can easily be mistaken for an outdoors
artwork for public enjoyment. Children regularly play and shout as they run
between the high concrete slabs.
Despite the architect's original intent, a small exhibition
hall was added underground, where visitors can learn about the history of the
Holocaust and consult databases provided by Yad Vashem.
As much as the architectural monument is a work of anonymity
and abstraction, the underground museum focuses on individuality and humanity.
One room tells the fate of 15 Jewish families from all over Europe; in another,
the names and short biographies of Holocaust victims are projected on a dark
wall, and recited in German and English.
Surprisingly, visitors to the German memorial are usually
more moved and disturbed by the visual exhibit below--with its traditional
display panels--rather than the cutting-edge design of the monument above. They
remain quiet and respectful downstairs, but often eat and laugh upstairs. It
seems that the architectural monument fails to meet the standards of a
Holocaust memorial, while the modest exhibition overachieves its educational
goal by becoming a memorial itself.
Contrary
to the other national memorials of significant importance, the Berlin Memorial
does not include a research center or archive, and it is not used for
ceremonies of any kind, whether official wreath-laying or religious services.
A Transnational Circuit of Remembrance
These four memorials show the passage of Holocaust
remembrance from victims to witnesses to perpetrators, and the increased
political and financial involvement of the State in national memory. In spite
of their differences, these memorials participate together in a transnational
circuit of remembrance practices; their "architecture of absence" is
emulated across continents, and each of the museums borrows archives and
objects from the others.
These
four sites also confirm that an artistic monument does not seem to be a fully
efficient memorial, without a museum or exhibit that offers a visual and
cognitive account of historical events. When art becomes too abstract or too
allusive, a memorial can lose its purpose, its identity can become ambiguous,
and its function unclear. The Holocaust, or any tragedy, cannot afford to be
commemorated in a limbo of uncertainty.
Brigitte Sion is a
Ph.D. candidate in Performance Studies at New York University. She is
completing her dissertation on the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin and the
Memorial to the Victims of State Terrorism in Buenos Aires.