Jewish Humor on the Couch
What Freud & his disciples said about Jewish comedy
By Leo M. Abrami
Reprinted with permission from Midstream magazine.
What can we learn from these anecdotes and expressions of
Jewish wit?
In his book, Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious,
Sigmund Freud suggested that many Jewish jokes point to the ability of the
Jewish people to (a) engage in a thorough self-criticism of themselves, (b)
advocate a democratic way of life, (c) emphasize the moral and social
principles the Jewish religion, (d) criticize the excessive requirements of it,
and (e) reflect on the misery of many Jewish communities.
Freud, who wrote this book some hundred years ago, was
actually paying homage to the capacity of the Jewish people to overcome the
oppressive social conditions that had been imposed upon them and their ability
to transcend them by laughing at them.
Masochism?
Some non-Jewish psychiatrists--even disciples of Freud--seem
to have had some difficulty in understanding the gist of Jewish wit and have
been particularly critical. Their preconceived ideas about the Jews may have
had a certain influence in their judgment. Dr. Edmund Bergier, in a book he
published in 1956, Laughter and the
Sense of Humor, expresses the view that a definite tendency to "psychic
masochism" is present in Jewish wit, and that certain external situations
(discrimination, poverty, the lack of opportunity, and the bitterness of life
in Eastern Europe) have predisposed Jews to a certain degree of masochism.
Dr. Martin Grotjahn, a disciple of Theodor Reik [who himself
was a disciple of Freud], published a book on the subject in 1960, titled Psychoanalysis
and the Jewish Joke, in which he advances the opinion that the witticisms
of Jews often start with an aggressive tendency, a shocking thought, or an
offensive statement in a disguised form. The release of aggression is sudden,
and the hostility or aggressiveness manifests itself in a masochistic way--that
is, turned against the Jew himself.
Pseudo-Masochism
These notions were
corrected, however, by Reik himself, who remarked that the masochistic aspect
of the Jewish joke may not be authentic. It is only pseudo-masochistic because
the masochism of Jewish wit is only a "mask" that does not show the
face behind it. For the ultimate aim of this display is the unconscious wish
to win the approval--or even the admiration--of the audience, and to regain one's
dignity. It is as if the jester were saying, "See how full of weaknesses
and failings I am. Therefore you must recognize my humanity, forgive me, and
love me again."
Reik justified his conclusion by stating that, contrary to
the clinically diagnosed masochist, the Jew does not derive gratification from
this type of behavior, as does the authentic masochist. Indeed, the Jew makes
fun of himself, but he does not come out humiliated or dirty. His self-humiliation
is perhaps only a measure of self-defense, which may protect him against
greater dangers. It is thus a kind of sacrifice made in order to survive. Jewish
jokes are therefore only pseudo-masochistic and not really masochistic.
|

|
|
Sigmund Freud
|
Reik went on to suggest the possibility of the coexistence
of masochistic humility and provocative insolence. As an example of this
attitude, he referred to a letter written by the German Jewish poet and writer
Heinrich Heine, who had converted to Christianity in hope of being accepted by
Western society, in which Heine a few months before his death says to his
brother Max, "Our forefathers
were brave people; they humbled themselves before God and were stubborn and
fearless towards the worldly powers. I, on the contrary, challenged Heaven with
impudence and was humble and servile towards people, and now, I lie on the
ground, like a worm that has been crushed under a foot."
That does not mean, of course, that we do not have some true
masochists or paranoid personalities among us from time to time, as the saying
goes: "Just because you are
paranoid, does not mean that they are not out to get you."
What Grotjahn meant by an aggression turned against itself
might be expressed in these words: "You
don't need to attack us. We can do that ourselves and even better. We can take
it. We know our weaknesses, and in a way, we are proud of them." Jewish
jokes, he writes, contain a kind of resignation and occasionally a stubborn
pride. They seem to say: "This is
the way we are and will be as long as we exist."
Two Sides to Every Story
For Freud and for Reik, the truth seemed at once simpler and
more complex. There is often a kind of oscillation between a pseudo-masochistic
self-humiliation and a sense of paranoid superiority in Jewish humor. Thus,
there are two sides to every Jewish story.
No one will deny that there is a high degree of resiliency
and courage that is displayed in many Jewish stories, and that has served as a
kind of defense-mechanism enabling Jews to confront adversity. The fact that
Jews are capable of making merciless fun of the shortcomings of their own
people is a positive trait, not a negative one, as some anti-Semites have tried
to construe it. Self-criticism, and even self-sarcasm, are part of the thought
process of the individual who is committed to intellectual and moral integrity.
The world has changed considerably in the years since Reik
wrote his book, and we may say, today, that the universal character of Jewish
wit has come to be enjoyed by many--Jews and non-Jews alike. Some of the finest
humorists on the American scene are Jewish, and many gentiles have learned to
enjoy and appreciate a good Jewish joke
Woody Allen is a case in point He may be ambivalent about
his Jewishness, but he has certainly not rejected the Jewish tradition of
humor He has been quoted as saying, "I have frequently been accused of being a self-hating Jew, and while
its true I hate myself, it's not because I am Jewish."
That's Jewish humor in full flower.
Leo M. Abrami is the
rabbi of Beth Emeth Congregation of the
Sun Cities and West Valley, Ariz.
This article is the last in a four-part
series on the characteristics of Jewish humor. The series originally appeared
as a single article in Midstream
magazine, which was anthologized in Best Jewish Writing 2003. It is reprinted with permission.