Growing Consciousness
Despite the Jewish dominance of Hollywood, Jewish filmmakers were not
always comfortable portraying Jewish themes on screen.
By David Desser and Lester D. Friedman
Reprinted with
permission from American-Jewish Filmmakers: Traditions and Trends (University of Illinois
Press).
Although Jewish executives, producers, writers, performers,
and directors dominate the American film industry, American movies before the
1960s rarely ventured very far beyond stereotypical Jewish characters trapped
within conventional situations. From 1908, when Walter Selig moved his company
to California--with the exception of Darryl E Zanuck's 20th Century-Fox
("the Goy Studio")--Jewish creative artists and businessmen guided
the destiny of America's largest propaganda machine.
Their pictures influenced not only the millions at home, but
also countless more abroad whose only view of America was cranked out by the
studios of such ill-educated but streetwise immigrants as Louis Mayer, Carl
Laemmle, Marcus Loew, Adolph Zukor, Harry Cohn, Jesse Lasky, the Warner
brothers, and Samuel Goldwyn.
How paradoxical that those films, which so accurately
captured the country's spirit, almost totally ignored one of America's most
prominent minorities. Howironic that
those pictures, which forever froze our national experiences into unforgettable
images, limited almost all references to the cultural and religious heritage of
the industry's leaders.
De-Semiticizing Films
A story about Harry Cohn of Columbia illustrates the
prevalent attitude among Jewish moguls throughout the studio years. The
director Richard Quine wanted to use a specific actor in a film. "He looks
too Jewish," barked the irritated Cohn, adding, "around this studio
the only Jews we put into pictures play Indians!" Louis Mayer (M-G-M)
obviously shared Cohn's cruder sentiments when he told the dejected Danny Kaye,
"I would put you under contract right now, but you look too Jewish. Have
some surgery to straighten out your nose, and then we'll talk."
Once, when an ailing studio chieftain walked into a
hospital, he was questioned about his heritage for the institution's records.
"American" he quickly responded, an answer that prompted a startled
volunteer to ask, "But aren't you Jewish?" "Oh, yes" he
added, "That too." "That too" aptly sums up the attitude of
Jews in Hollywood, both on and off the screen, from the inception of movies
until the end of the studio system in the late Fifties. The attempt at almost
total assimilation by the powerful men who ran the studios reflected itself in
a de-Semiticizing of the action that took place in front of the lenses.
A New Generation
The death of Harry Cohn on March 2, 1958, signaled the end
of one-man studio rule in Hollywood. Although Adolph Zukor lived until 1967 and
Samuel Goldwyn until 1974, they retained little actual power. Many who
replaced the old moguls in the industry's hierarchy were also Jewish, but they
were American-born and had radically different worldviews than their immigrant
predecessors.
Some had degrees in management and accounting; most were
college-educated. All were far removed, both physically and psychologically,
from the old-country shtetls [small
Eastern European villages] and immigrant experiences that helped shape the
dictatorial Jewish studio bosses. Although some looked back nostalgically to
the paternalistic studios and their erratic, colorful chieftains, most of this
new breed realized that those bygone days were ancient history.
Freed from a monolithic studio system that cranked out
predictable assembly-line films supporting white, male, middle-class, Christian
values, the movies from the 1960s onward provocatively mirrored the growing
ethnic consciousness that marked the evolution of American history.
Thus, an emerging ethnic concern, coupled with the
destruction of the old studio system, inspired film producers in the 1960s to
transcend moribund racial stereotypes and create a cinema that confronted
ethnic issues and characters with greater understanding, sensitivity, and sophistication.
Ethnic consciousness in the American cinema is a fairly recent trend, however,
one that sprung to life during the turbulent era of campus protests, Flower
Power, and cultural upheaval. The United States of the 1960s prized individuality
over sameness.
Valuing Ethnicity
The notion of a "great melting pot" that reduced
everyone to blandly similar types, therefore, held little interest for people
needing to proclaim their uniqueness. To discover who they were, many reached
back to their ethnic origins, back to the customs and traditions that made
their heritage--and, by extension, themselves--distinctive. And they liked what
they found. Many saw ethnic identification as an alternative to a modern,
computerized world of the Fifties that rewarded uniformity and praised
conformity.
Ethnic affiliation, pride in belonging to a minority culture
group, thus became important, one critical element in what has continued to be
a nationwide obsession with ethnicity. Since the 1960s, minority-group members
have found themselves scrutinized under the penetrating lenses of America's
movie cameras, their traditions explored and their psyches dissected.
By the middle of the 1960s, therefore, American film
directors found it possible to speak overtly about ethnic issues, to have
ethnic characters clearly identified as such within their films, and to confront
controversial issues with few fears of industry (or even audience) backlash.
Jewish directors new to the cinema--for example, Woody Allen and Mel Brooks--found
a freedom of expression absolutely unknown to earlier generations, while
veterans such as Sidney Lumet found themselves suddenly free from many of the
constraints that had shackled them throughout their television and early film
careers.
Faced with this new freedom of expression, Jewish
filmmakers had no direct tradition, no previous examples or models, to draw
upon in creating a visual art filtered through their Jewish consciousness. Of
course, one might question the extent to which they contemplated or even
desired to fashion a film art that was somehow specifically Jewish, but
nevertheless the directors turned to Jewish themes and characters to take
advantage of the ethnic sensibility characteristic of contemporary American
culture. In so doing, however, they faced an empty past, a cinematic lacuna
they attempted to fill with models drawn from other, earlier Jewish forays into
art and popular culture.
David Desser is the director of cinema studies at the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and former editor of Cinema Journal.
Lester D. Friedman is a member of the radio/TV/film department at Northwestern
University.
From American-Jewish
Filmmakers: Traditions and Trends.
Copyright 1993, 2004 by Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Used
with permission of the University
of Illinois Press.